A nonpartisan civic resource · Updated June 2026

Understand AI policy before you vote.

AI Vote Guide explains how artificial intelligence is being regulated, debated, and contested in American politics — without requiring a technical background.

Tracked to date · as of July 10, 2026
$53.35M

in confirmed FEC independent expenditures on 2026 candidates.

Pro-innovation
$22.90M
Think Big · American Mission
Pro-safety
$30.45M
Jobs and Democracy · Defending Our Values · Dream NYC · You Can Push Back
War chest · not yet deployed
$131.7M+ still unspent
Raised across AI PAC networks but not yet spent against specific candidates

$185M+ has been raised across AI industry PACs and nonprofits; $53.35M is the FEC-verified total spent on candidates so far.

See where it's going →
Featured update
June 24, 2026
Elections

AI-backed candidates go 18 for 20 in 2026 primaries — but lose the race that mattered most

With the June 23 primaries decided, AI super PAC spending has backed winning candidates in 18 of 20 resolved races. The two losses: Jesse Jackson Jr. (IL-02), who lost despite $1.43M in Think Big support, and Alex Bores (NY-12), the cycle's most-watched and most-expensive AI race. Among the winners: Celeste Maloy (UT-03) with $920K in Defending Our Values support, Ben McAdams (UT-01) with $1.06M from Think Big, and incumbents Ritchie Torres (NY-15), Yvette Clarke (NY-09), and Joseph Morelle (NY-25). Several races remain: Julia Letlow (LA-Senate, June 27), Manny Rutinel (CO-08, June 30), Aaron Flint (MT-01, August 4), and Amanda McKinney (WA-04, August 4).

Why this mattersThe 18-2 record looks impressive but requires honest context. Most winners were incumbents or heavily favored establishment candidates in safe seats — the AI money backed likely winners, not created upsets. The one race where the outcome was genuinely contested and the spending genuinely decisive — NY-12 — went against the AI industry's target. Jackson Jr.'s loss in IL-02 is the strongest counter-example: $1.43M of pro-innovation money failed outright.

Read the briefing →
Briefing · Updated June 2026

This week in AI policy

View all →
Regulation

Colorado AI Act full compliance deadline approaching June 30

The Colorado AI Act, the first comprehensive state-level AI governance law, reaches its full compliance deadline on June 30, 2026. Organizations deploying high-risk AI systems in Colorado must have impact assessments and algorithmic discrimination protections in place.

Why this mattersColorado is the first real test of whether state-level AI regulation can be enforced in practice. How companies respond here will set the pattern for other states.

Ongoing, deadline Jun 30, 2026
Elections

AI's most expensive primary is decided — Bores loses despite more money on his side

Micah Lasher won the NY-12 Democratic primary with 39% of the vote. Alex Bores, who authored the RAISE Act and became the top target of AI industry opposition spending, finished second at 35%. The race was the most expensive AI PAC contest of the 2026 cycle — $27.41M in AI-linked independent expenditures flowed into this single primary. Think Big (Leading the Future network) spent $8.15M opposing Bores. On the other side, Jobs and Democracy ($13.16M), You Can Push Back ($3.34M), Dream NYC ($2.48M), and Guardrails Alliance ($285K) spent a combined $19.26M supporting him — a more than 2-to-1 advantage. The result defies a simple narrative: Bores had more AI money behind him than against him and still lost. The largest single PAC in the race was not an AI group — Michael Bloomberg's Stand for New York spent close to $10M backing Lasher, who also had endorsements from Rep. Nadler and Gov. Hochul and strong support among older voters. Whether AI industry opposition spending contributed to Bores' loss, or whether Bloomberg's money, the endorsements, and a crowded field mattered more, will be debated. Bores' response: 'Though we've come up short tonight, the example set here was not the one the AI oligarchs intended.'

Why this mattersThe AI industry intended this race as a warning to candidates who cross it. But Bores came within 4 points despite being massively outspent by Bloomberg on the other side, and the pro-safety PACs actually outspent the pro-innovation opposition. The lesson may be less about AI money's power and more about the limits of outside spending against a well-funded, well-endorsed establishment candidate.

June 23, 2026
ElectionsDisclosure

AI PAC spending climbs to $53.75M — pro-safety opens $9M lead

FEC-verified independent expenditures on 2026 candidates now total $53.75M (Transformer-aligned, June 24): $31.37M pro-safety vs $22.38M pro-innovation. Pro-safety has opened a roughly $9M lead, driven almost entirely by the NY-12 race supporting Alex Bores from Jobs and Democracy ($13.16M), You Can Push Back ($3.34M), Dream NYC ($2.48M), and Guardrails Alliance ($285K).

Why this mattersTwo months ago the conventional read was that industry money would swamp pro-regulation candidates. By dollar volume, the opposite happened — pro-safety PACs now outspend pro-innovation across the cycle.

Elections

Scorecard update: Hern wins Oklahoma, 11 AI-backed candidates have now advanced

Of decided races where AI super PAC money was spent, 11 backed candidates have advanced, 1 lost (Jesse Jackson Jr., IL-02), and 1 is pending verification (Bob Brooks, PA-07). Advanced: Panetta (CA-19), McGowan (IA-04), Bean (IL-08), Foushee (NC-04), Buckhout (NC-01), Menendez (NJ-08), Kingston (GA-01), Graham (SC-Sen), Ricketts (NE-Sen), Poindexter (OH-07), and Hern (OK-Sen) — who won the June 16 GOP primary, Trump-endorsed, and advances to November in a safe-Republican seat. Defending Our Values PAC's $808K pro-safety bet backed a winner.

Why this mattersSeveral of these winners (Graham, Hern, Ricketts) were heavily favored incumbents or Trump-endorsed frontrunners in safe seats, where AI PAC money was a small fraction of total spending and not decisive to the outcome. The clearest test of whether AI money actually moves a race remains NY-12 (Bores), decided June 23.

June 17, 2026
Elections

Support for Bores overtakes opposition in most expensive AI race

Pro-safety PACs have now outspent the opposition in NY-12 — $6.81M supporting Alex Bores vs $6.31M opposing, $13.12M total, the costliest AI PAC race in the country. As Transformer's Veronica Irwin noted, many assumed Bores would be 'stamped out' by industry money; that's not what happened.

Why this mattersThe marquee test of whether AI industry money can defeat a pro-regulation candidate is breaking against the industry.

Elections

First results are in: AI-backed candidates split

The earliest 2026 primaries have produced the first results in races where AI money was spent. Among pro-innovation (Leading the Future network) picks: Melissa Bean (IL-08) advanced, but Jesse Jackson Jr. (IL-02) lost despite $1.43M in Think Big support. Jimmy Panetta (CA-19) and Chris McGowan (IA-04) advanced. Among pro-safety picks: Valerie Foushee (NC-04) won a razor-thin primary with $1.61M in support. The marquee race — Bores in NY-12 — votes June 23.

Why this mattersThe first scorecard on whether AI PAC money actually moves primaries is mixed — at least one heavily backed candidate (Jackson Jr.) lost outright.

June 10, 2026

A public-interest guide to AI policy.

Independent. Nonpartisan. Source-verified. Built to make AI policy legible to everyone, not just industry insiders.

About this project →