A nonpartisan civic resource · Updated June 2026

Understand AI policy before you vote.

AI Vote Guide explains how artificial intelligence is being regulated, debated, and contested in American politics — without requiring a technical background.

Tracked to date · as of June 24, 2026
$50.14M

in confirmed FEC independent expenditures on 2026 candidates.

Pro-innovation
$22.23M
Think Big · American Mission
Pro-safety
$27.91M
Jobs and Democracy · Defending Our Values · Dream NYC · You Can Push Back
War chest · not yet deployed
$134.9M+ still unspent
Raised across AI PAC networks but not yet spent against specific candidates

$185M+ has been raised across AI industry PACs and nonprofits; $50.14M is the FEC-verified total spent on candidates so far.

See where it's going →
Featured update
June 24, 2026
Updated this week
Elections

Bores loses NY-12 to Lasher — AI industry's marquee target falls despite being outspent 2-to-1

Micah Lasher won the NY-12 Democratic primary 39% to 35% over Alex Bores, the AI safety candidate who wrote New York's RAISE Act. The race drew $27.41M in AI PAC spending — $19.26M in pro-safety support for Bores vs $8.15M from Leading the Future opposing him — making it the most expensive AI PAC contest of the 2026 cycle. Lasher, a Nadler protégé backed by $10M+ from Michael Bloomberg, was favored from the start. In his victory speech, he disavowed both AI PAC networks: 'I won't be taking my cues from either of you when it comes to protecting our kids, our jobs, our environment.' In his concession, Bores called Leading the Future's funders 'a handful of oligarchs hellbent on preventing any regulation of their industry.'

Why this mattersThe first true test of whether AI industry money can defeat a pro-regulation candidate ended ambiguously. Leading the Future spent more in NY-12 than any other race and got the outcome it wanted — but pro-safety groups outspent it more than 2-to-1, and Lasher publicly rejected both sides. The clearer signal: pouring $27M of AI-coded money into a single House primary did not visibly change a race that institutional Democratic politics had already shaped.

Read the briefing →
Briefing · Updated June 2026

This week in AI policy

View all →
Regulation

Colorado AI Act full compliance deadline approaching June 30

The Colorado AI Act, the first comprehensive state-level AI governance law, reaches its full compliance deadline on June 30, 2026. Organizations deploying high-risk AI systems in Colorado must have impact assessments and algorithmic discrimination protections in place.

Why this mattersColorado is the first real test of whether state-level AI regulation can be enforced in practice. How companies respond here will set the pattern for other states.

Ongoing, deadline Jun 30, 2026
ElectionsDisclosureUpdated this week

AI PAC spending climbs to $50.14M — pro-safety opens $5.7M lead

FEC-verified independent expenditures on 2026 candidates now total $50.14M (Transformer-aligned, June 24): $27.91M pro-safety vs $22.23M pro-innovation. Pro-safety has opened a roughly $5.7M lead, driven almost entirely by the NY-12 race supporting Alex Bores from Dream NYC, Jobs and Democracy PAC, Guardrails Alliance, and You Can Push Back.

Why this mattersTwo months ago the conventional read was that industry money would swamp pro-regulation candidates. By dollar volume, the opposite happened — pro-safety PACs now outspend pro-innovation across the cycle.

ElectionsUpdated this week

Scorecard update: Hern wins Oklahoma, 11 AI-backed candidates have now advanced

Of decided races where AI super PAC money was spent, 11 backed candidates have advanced, 1 lost (Jesse Jackson Jr., IL-02), and 1 is pending verification (Bob Brooks, PA-07). Advanced: Panetta (CA-19), McGowan (IA-04), Bean (IL-08), Foushee (NC-04), Buckhout (NC-01), Menendez (NJ-08), Kingston (GA-01), Graham (SC-Sen), Ricketts (NE-Sen), Poindexter (OH-07), and Hern (OK-Sen) — who won the June 16 GOP primary, Trump-endorsed, and advances to November in a safe-Republican seat. Defending Our Values PAC's $808K pro-safety bet backed a winner.

Why this mattersSeveral of these winners (Graham, Hern, Ricketts) were heavily favored incumbents or Trump-endorsed frontrunners in safe seats, where AI PAC money was a small fraction of total spending and not decisive to the outcome. The clearest test of whether AI money actually moves a race remains NY-12 (Bores), decided June 23.

June 17, 2026
Elections

Support for Bores overtakes opposition in most expensive AI race

Pro-safety PACs have now outspent the opposition in NY-12 — $6.81M supporting Alex Bores vs $6.31M opposing, $13.12M total, the costliest AI PAC race in the country. As Transformer's Veronica Irwin noted, many assumed Bores would be 'stamped out' by industry money; that's not what happened.

Why this mattersThe marquee test of whether AI industry money can defeat a pro-regulation candidate is breaking against the industry.

Elections

First results are in: AI-backed candidates split

The earliest 2026 primaries have produced the first results in races where AI money was spent. Among pro-innovation (Leading the Future network) picks: Melissa Bean (IL-08) advanced, but Jesse Jackson Jr. (IL-02) lost despite $1.43M in Think Big support. Jimmy Panetta (CA-19) and Chris McGowan (IA-04) advanced. Among pro-safety picks: Valerie Foushee (NC-04) won a razor-thin primary with $1.61M in support. The marquee race — Bores in NY-12 — votes June 23.

Why this mattersThe first scorecard on whether AI PAC money actually moves primaries is mixed — at least one heavily backed candidate (Jackson Jr.) lost outright.

June 10, 2026
ElectionsDisclosure

Demand Progress launches AI Money Watch to track Leading the Future

The progressive nonprofit launched a monitoring effort focused on Leading the Future's spending, joining a growing set of AI-money trackers.

Why this mattersMore watchdogs are tracking AI political spending as the primaries approach.

June 10, 2026

A public-interest guide to AI policy.

Independent. Nonpartisan. Source-verified. Built to make AI policy legible to everyone, not just industry insiders.

About this project →